企業網站底部一般都會顯示“技術支持：某某”，且點擊該文字的超鏈接可以跳轉至對應建站公司的官方網站。根據建站行業的通行慣例，網站底部技術支持所指向的建站公司即(ji)為該網(wang)站的(de)制(zhi)作者(zhe)。

雖(sui)然如此，（2022）最高法(fa)知民終384號民事判決書并(bing)不(bu)支持以網(wang)(wang)站(zhan)(zhan)底部(bu)(bu)“技(ji)(ji)術(shu)支持”確定被(bei)訴(su)(su)侵權(quan)(quan)網(wang)(wang)站(zhan)(zhan)的建(jian)(jian)站(zhan)(zhan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)。根(gen)據(ju)(ju)該案(an)的在(zai)案(an)證(zheng)(zheng)據(ju)(ju)：網(wang)(wang)站(zhan)(zhan)首頁(ye)備注“技(ji)(ji)術(shu)支持：武漢網(wang)(wang)站(zhan)(zhan)建(jian)(jian)設(she)”；被(bei)訴(su)(su)侵權(quan)(quan)網(wang)(wang)站(zhan)(zhan)底部(bu)(bu)顯示(shi)：“技(ji)(ji)術(shu)支持：網(wang)(wang)站(zhan)(zhan)建(jian)(jian)設(she)”，點擊“網(wang)(wang)站(zhan)(zhan)建(jian)(jian)設(she)”另彈出瀏覽器窗口進入(ru)“www.…….com”頁(ye)面。”。不(bu)過(guo)法(fa)院審理認為(wei)該證(zheng)(zheng)據(ju)(ju)并(bing)不(bu)能證(zheng)(zheng)明被(bei)訴(su)(su)侵權(quan)(quan)網(wang)(wang)站(zhan)(zhan)的建(jian)(jian)站(zhan)(zhan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)即(ji)為(wei)“技(ji)(ji)術(shu)支持”所(suo)指(zhi)向(xiang)的網(wang)(wang)絡公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)：米拓公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)主張(zhang)**公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)被(bei)訴(su)(su)侵權(quan)(quan)網(wang)(wang)站(zhan)(zhan)底部(bu)(bu)鏈接指(zhi)向(xiang)的域名所(suo)涉企業系(xi)建(jian)(jian)站(zhan)(zhan)的第三方(fang)，并(bing)認為(wei)**公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)惡意與建(jian)(jian)站(zhan)(zhan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)串(chuan)通，未披露雙方(fang)的委(wei)托合同以逃避(bi)法(fa)律責任。但本(ben)案(an)中尚(shang)沒(mei)有充分證(zheng)(zheng)據(ju)(ju)證(zheng)(zheng)明**公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)存在(zai)惡意串(chuan)通行為(wei)，相反，**公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)主張(zhang)被(bei)訴(su)(su)侵權(quan)(quan)網(wang)(wang)站(zhan)(zhan)系(xi)其委(wei)托第三方(fang)所(suo)建(jian)(jian)。

因此，在(zai)網(wang)站(zhan)使用者不(bu)提供建站(zhan)合同或支付憑(ping)證相關證據、建站(zhan)公(gong)司未參與(yu)庭審亦未自(zi)認的情況下，單(dan)憑(ping)網(wang)站(zhan)底(di)部“技術支持”所指來(lai)確定網(wang)站(zhan)建站(zhan)公(gong)司的觀點并不(bu)能成立。